[Last modified: December, 2 2024 11:54 AM]
The case study that I’m examining is about a student who wants to conduct research with a group of women at a domestic violence refuge in Pakistan. There are several layers of complexity here that make it a complicated project to approve from an ethics standpoint, which I’ll lay out here.
The first difficulty is that these interlocutors are in a vulnerable position. They are survivors of domestic violence, and they are staying at this refuge during a time of physical and emotional upheaval. There are also possible power dynamics at play, since the student was working there, and participants may think they’re required to participate or they’ll be at risk of removal from the refuge or other repurcussions for being “ungrateful.” There is also a great risk of harm to participants if their identity, location, or personal details were made public and their abuser found out. Unlike a lot of ethnographic research, a mistake from this student leading to a data breach could have serious, even violent repercussions. This immediately puts the project to high risk and needing to be approved by the larger UCL committee.
The matter of the individual who the student helped is another factor. There is no such thing as getting ethics approval for research done prior, so any data collected during that summer could not be used in this students’ dissertation, even if she had gotten written consent from the interlocutor. However, there’s a possibility she could cite the published article with proper permissions from the participant, as long as any information provided there would not lead to the woman’s abuser finding her or perpetuating further harm in any way. There would need to be a lot of further discussion about this, but if I were on the ethics committee, I simply don’t think this project is feasible at a master’s level. There are just too many chances for harm to be done.