[Last modified: December, 5 2024 11:24 PM]
Case 1 Research on women survivors of domestic violence in Pakistan involves several important ethical issues. The lack of written informed consent in research is a serious issue. The researcher must clearly tell participants what the research is about, what it will be used for, and the possible risks, and obtain their written consent. Even if participants volunteered to disclose their stories and names, the researcher still needed to make sure they understood the possible dangers of disclosing their identities, such as privacy breaches or security threats.
These women are survivors of domestic violence and they belong to a vulnerable group. There is a clear power gap between the researcher and the participants, especially in the shelter setting. The researcher must ensure that the interviews are entirely voluntary and that no pressure is exerted on the participants or their situation is used to facilitate the research. At the same time, the researcher needs to protect the psychological well-being of the participants.
Publicising participants’ stories and true identities could lead to further harm, such as retaliation from abusers or social discrimination. Researchers need to treat data with strict confidentiality and anonymise it in academic work, unless the participant has given explicit and fully informed consent.
Due to the sensitive nature of the research, the researcher also needs to ensure that the research process meets the highest ethical standards and that effective monitoring mechanisms are in place.
In summary, researchers should adopt a clear informed consent process, anonymise data, put in place a risk management plan and prioritise the safety of participants. Only then can research be conducted with respect and protection for participants.