[Last modified: December, 4 2024 01:05 AM]
If I were guiding the student as part of the Anthropology Ethics Committee, I would emphasize the importance of adhering to ethical standards to minimize risks to both the researcher and the studied community. This research on veganism through street art poses ethical challenges due to privacy concerns, the potential for legal exposure, and the power dynamics inherent in studying vulnerable or marginalized groups.
Legal Risks: The student must be cautious when working with content that might involve illegal activities, such as spray-painting walls without permission. While the research does not involve encouraging or participating in these actions, documenting or publicizing such activities could expose both the researcher and participants to legal scrutiny. I would advise the student to anonymize all data thoroughly, ensuring that no specific individuals, locations, or other identifying details are revealed. Furthermore, the student should avoid directly engaging with individuals involved in illegal activities unless clear consent and ethical safeguards are in place.
Privacy Concerns: The use of online materials from public and semi-private platforms requires careful navigation. For example, joining a closed Facebook group entails answering questions for access, which could raise concerns about coercion or misrepresentation. The student should be transparent with group administrators about the research purpose and ensure that participation is voluntary. Data from these groups should be aggregated and anonymized to protect member identities. Similarly, while the Instagram account of the vegan artist is public, the small number of followers makes the artist highly identifiable. Any references to this account should be anonymized or paraphrased to protect the individual’s privacy.
Since the artist claims to be 18 years old, the student must confirm the individual’s age and ensure that they fully understand the implications of their participation. Working with young individuals in niche activist communities requires sensitivity to power dynamics. The student should avoid imposing interpretations or drawing undue attention to participants that could lead to harm.
Also, all data should be stored securely on encrypted devices, with separate files for anonymized and raw data. Data should be securely deleted after the project concludes.
Finally, the student should ensure the research benefits the community by highlighting their efforts and providing insights that validate their advocacy work. Sharing results with participants in an accessible format could foster trust and mutual respect.