[Last modified: November, 29 2024 01:48 PM]
Ethical Issues
•Informed Consent: Elderly participants may face cognitive or linguistic barriers to understanding the research’s scope. The student must ensure participants are fully informed and give explicit, voluntary consent.
•Impact of Research: The research could unintentionally stigmatize participants who struggle with technology, potentially causing embarrassment or harming their self-esteem.
Data Protection Issues
•Diaries and social diagrams may contain personal and sensitive information about participants’ lives and relationships. Proper anonymization and secure data storage protocols are essential to safeguard this information.
Power/Coercion
•The student’s dual role as a volunteer and researcher may create a power imbalance, where participants feel obliged to engage due to the researcher’s perceived authority or contribution to the community center.
Vulnerability and Sensitivity
•Participants over 65 may be vulnerable due to potential cognitive decline, physical limitations, or social isolation. The research topic itself is not inherently sensitive, but personal reflections on social lives could lead to emotional discomfort for some participants.
Ethical Approval
•This project is likely to be classified as low risk but should still receive approval from the Anthropology Ethics Committee, given the involvement of potentially vulnerable individuals and the collection of personal data.
Ethical Guidance for Research on Elderly Technology Use in London
Below are key considerations and recommendations:
Informed Consent
The researcher must ensure that consent is informed, voluntary, and ongoing. Given the potential vulnerability of participants, a clear and accessible consent process should be developed. This could include:
•Providing information sheets in large font and plain language.
•Offering opportunities for participants to ask questions and withdraw at any time without repercussions.
•Using verbal consent protocols for individuals with literacy challenges, supported by audio-recorded agreements.
Data Protection
Diaries, interviews, and social diagrams may reveal sensitive personal information. The student must:
•Anonymize all data before analysis.
•Use secure data storage systems to prevent unauthorized access.
•Include a clear explanation in the consent form about how data will be used, stored, and shared.
Addressing Power Dynamics
The researcher’s dual role as a volunteer and interviewer could unintentionally pressure participants to engage. To mitigate this:
•The researcher should emphasize that participation is optional and will not affect their access to courses or services.
•They should adopt a neutral stance, avoiding overly familiar interactions that could influence responses.
Minimizing Harm
To prevent harm, the student must avoid language or actions that could highlight technological shortcomings in a way that embarrasses participants. Offering participants positive reinforcement and an opportunity to reflect on their growth can help counteract any potential negative effects.
Vulnerability and Sensitivity
While elderly participants are considered a vulnerable group, the topic itself is not inherently sensitive. However, the researcher must be prepared to address emotional responses that might arise during interviews or diary reflections.
Ethical Review
This project is low risk but should be reviewed by the Anthropology Ethics Committee due to the inclusion of a vulnerable population. The student should submit a detailed risk assessment outlining steps to protect participants and address potential ethical concerns.
Conclusion
By following these recommendations, the researcher can ensure the project is conducted ethically, with the dignity and safety of participants prioritized.