[Last modified: December, 2 2024 02:11 AM]
Our group mainly discussed the project which is concerning the young women’s perceptions of breasts and breastfeeding.This project explores the various and contradictory social messages about breasts and appropriate bodily behavior in the context of encouragement of breastfeeding, debates about public breastfeeding and the public sexualisation of breasts through advertising and other media. The research will involve interviews, group discussions and a questionnaire with (a) sixth-form students (aged 16-19) at two schools in London and (b) a mother-toddler group, in order to reveal young women’s perceptions of their breasts and bodies and their understanding of what shapes these perceptions.
And here are our results and reflections about the question.
1.What ethical issues (if any) arise from this project? How should they be addressed?
Firstly, we suppose the informed consent should be acquired from the participants. They must fully understand the purpose, nature, and potential implications of the research. Ensuring age-appropriate, clear, and accessible information will be crucial.
Besides, their privacy and anonymity should be considered. As the discussions are about breasts, bodies, and societal perceptions may be deeply personal. Researchers must guarantee confidentiality and anonymity, using pseudonyms and securely storing data.
Also, the discussions about body image and societal pressures might cause distress or discomfort for participants. Researchers should provide access to support services and the option to withdraw without consequences. In this case, the participants should be fully informed if they felt uncomfortable during the procedure. They have the right to ask for leave.
2.What data protection issues (if any) arise from this project?
The personal information could be stored anonymously or at least use pseudonyms. And all data (audio recordings, transcripts, questionnaires) must be encrypted and securely stored.
3.Are there any problems around power / coercion?
Power dynamics could arise, especially with young participants (aged 16-19), who might feel pressured to participate due to their age or relationships with teachers or other authority figures. As a result, we should clearly communicate that participation is voluntary and unrelated to their education or relationships with authority figures as well as avoid conducting interviews in settings where authority figures are present.
4.Are ‘vulnerable’ individuals involved? Could the topic be considered sensitive?
Yes, vulnerable individuals are involved. Sixth-form students and mothers might feel vulnerable discussing body image and breastfeeding. The topic is sensitive due to its link to societal pressures, sexualization, and personal experiences.
5.Should this be approved by the Anthropology Ethics Committee? Or should it go to UCL REC? Would it be considered low or high risk?
This project should be reviewed by the UCL Research Ethics Committee (REC) because of the inclusion of minors and sensitive topics. It would likely be considered high risk due to its sensitive nature and involvement of potentially vulnerable participants.