[Last modified: November, 30 2024 09:59 PM]
This week’s focus on ethics has prompted me to critically reflect on my initial cafe research and the ethical considerations it entails. One of the key issues that stood out to me is the question of power dynamics. As a researcher, I hold a position of power in how I observe, interpret, and present the actions and experiences of participants. This raises important questions about whose voices are prioritized in the research and how those voices are represented.
In the context of cafes, while my initial focus might be on the sensory and social interactions within these spaces, I now recognize the importance of considering those who might be more marginalized or vulnerable in these environments. For instance, cafe spaces are often seen as inclusive, but they may subtly exclude individuals who cannot afford to participate in the cafe culture or who feel out of place due to class, race, or other social dynamics. How do I ensure that such voices are not overlooked or invisibly marginalized in my research? This requires me to consciously expand my scope and methods to include perspectives that might otherwise remain hidden or undervalued.
The issue of power also relates to how I engage with participants during the research process. Even in informal conversations or observations, there is a risk that my position as a researcher might influence how people behave or respond. This dynamic requires careful reflexivity on my part, constantly questioning how my presence shapes the space and interactions I observe.
Additionally, this focus on ethics has made me more aware of the need to handle sensitive or personal data with care. For instance, if I document interactions between people or note patterns in their behavior, how do I ensure that their privacy and dignity are respected, especially if the insights touch on personal or vulnerable aspects of their lives?
Finally, I anticipate ethical dilemmas in navigating public versus private boundaries within the cafe space. While cafes are semi-public environments, people often seek them out as places of comfort, focus, or even solitude. Observing or documenting behaviors in such spaces risks intruding on personal moments, even if done discreetly. Seeking informed consent, particularly in such a dynamic setting, poses practical challenges.