[Last modified: December, 6 2024 03:42 AM]
In this week’s workshop, we focused on the ethical issues surrounding indigenous identity and disempowerment, particularly examining the challenges faced by indigenous migrants in the slums of São Paulo, Brazil. These challenges include the loss of their homeland leading to a forced diaspora, persistent poverty, and violent conflicts. Our exploration centered on how these issues are addressed through indigenous migrants’ territorial struggles and how these migrants perceive their relationship with the state, especially in the context of the anti-human rights stance of the Bolsonaro government. The project also incorporates interviews with activists and participation in meetings held by indigenous associations to gain deeper insights.
The ethical issues discussed in this context were primarily divided into three parts:
1.Exploitation of Vulnerable Groups:
Indigenous groups are often politically and socially marginalized, which makes them vulnerable in research settings. When researchers ask questions, there is a significant risk of exploiting their vulnerabilities due to inherent biases or assumptions. This exploitation can stem from researchers perceiving indigenous participants as less powerful or assuming they have fewer options to refuse or withdraw from the study. While the risk level here is moderate, the imbalance of power between researchers and participants may hinder the latter’s ability to fully consent or opt out, raising ethical concerns about autonomy and respect for participants’ rights.
2.Cultural Sensitivity:
Due to information gaps and a lack of deep understanding of indigenous cultures, researchers may inadvertently misinterpret or misrepresent indigenous practices and beliefs. This lack of cultural sensitivity not only risks introducing bias into the study but also threatens the trust between researchers and indigenous communities. While the level of risk is moderate, the consequences can undermine the validity of the research findings and damage long-term relationships with the population being studied.
3.Confidentiality and Privacy with Political Consequences:
The collection of life histories and personal opinions during the study poses significant risks, particularly in politically sensitive contexts. Participants’ personal experiences and viewpoints may inadvertently become public, exposing them to potential backlash, discrimination, or harm. Given the politically charged environment in Brazil, especially under Bolsonaro’s government, the risks associated with confidentiality breaches are high. Protecting participants’ privacy is paramount to ensuring their safety and maintaining ethical standards.
Addressing these ethical concerns requires careful planning, sensitivity, and adherence to ethical guidelines. Researchers must be vigilant in respecting participants’ rights, fostering trust, and minimizing risks throughout the study.