Navigating through my positionality and studying immigrant communities

[Last modified: November, 2 2024 10:37 AM]

In my pilot research project, I’m delving into the social dynamics of a marginalised urban East African migrant community based in Southall area in west London, and the political aspects are a big part of how I’ve structured my work. As someone who’s utterly determined to promotion of fairness and social justice, and my research reflects an essential mental attitude that questions embedded and systemic inequalities. This means I believe in fairness and the significance of listening to voices that are often overlooked. I intend to make sure that my research serves not only the East African migrant community but, also other communities who are sidelined in societal discussions sticking diligently to the core principles of participatory action research.

As an anthropology student, I also must think about my own position in this project as both East African as well as former refugee myself. Since I’m coming from inside the community I’m studying, I’m very aware of my positionality and the power dynamics involved. I recognise my own privileges and biases as a naturalised British citizen who wants to engage with participants as collaborators some of whom still waiting for their asylum application. With that in mind, I understand that my obtained citizenship can still create imbalance, as I might be seen as part and parcel of the state structure. To mitigate this issue, I make it a priority to be reflective and transparent in my approach, ensuring that my presence doesn’t overshadow the views of those I’m trying to study.

The outcome of my study could reach beyond the academic sphere and potentially affect local policy makers or concerned social services. By documenting the experiences and concerns of immigrant community members, hoping to equip them with the advocatory tools that might help them access resources. Having said that, I’m fully aware of the ethical challenges that come with this endeavour; if my findings are misinterpreted or misunderstood, they could reinforce stereotypes or lead to unintended negative consequence.

Therefore, to navigate through these compounded factors, I decided modifying my methods to be more accommodating and responsive to the needs and concerns of the participants. Inspired by collaborative ethnography, as discussed by Estalella and Criado (2018), I’m incorporating fieldwork techniques that promote shared ownership of the research. This approach is designed to level the playing field in the research process, creating a more inclusive environment that respects the community’s pronounced autonomy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please sign in first
You are on your way to create a site.