[Last modified: December, 6 2024 09:39 AM]
Case:
3. Veganism through street art
The student wants to conduct research on the propagation of veganism through street art using interviews with street artists and online analysis of social media. The student proposes to use a range of online materials include publically accessible and anonymous images of street art, publicly accessible blogs and social media accounts. One of these is a closed Facebook group for vegan activists for which the student would have to answer a series of questions to be allowed access by the administrator. Another is a public Instagram account of a young vegan who shares photos and videos of herself spray-painting walls in unknown locations with animal rights messages. The vegan artist claims on her profile that she is 18 years old and all the posts are public with hashtags. However, the account has only 40 followers, mostly others involved in a small-scale activist community.
Ethical Considerations:
Since the case involves multiple stakeholders it will be important to unravel the strands and run each nuance through the ethics lens.
First and foremost, to get facts in place, it is pertinent to understand the law of land as the case involves public art. If found illegal, the risk factor is high as the research could go promoting this art form and bring the student research in legal trouble.
The use of “online materials include publicly accessible and anonymous images of street art, publicly accessible blogs and social media accounts” should be quite okay to use with proper referencing since it is already publicly published information.
For the second subject of the research, the closed facebook group, the administrator of the group is going to do due diligence before letting the student researcher access the group. Which is a good ground check and helps get warmed up to the leader of the group. On ethics ground, if the student researcher does get the permission to access the group, it still doesn’t gives the researcher the liberty to use content shared within the group, by other participants, which the researcher could do with publicly open digital domains discussed in the last paragraph. In this case, written consent should be taken from the people owning IPR and privacy rights for their content to be shared outside of the facebook group.
As for the “public Instagram account of a young vegan who shares photos and videos of herself spray-painting walls in unknown locations with animal rights messages”, law of the land around spray painting public property, especially walls, needs to be looked into. If found illegal, this content she posts on her Instagram account cannot be considered just by the virtue of public information since it comes with a heavy legal baggage. Any propagation of her work, through the researcher’s published findings, can land the artist in legal trouble. On another note, the age of the artist, if doubtful, should be confirmed through the consent form and maybe a legal identity proof document, for another risk factor of exposing details of a minor in the research findings exists. This would need a separate consent from her parents/guardians/closest of kin. The number of followers, and their activist tendencies don’t directly impact the ethical considerations, but I wonder that since it’s an open instagram page, and the followers list is also publicly visible, do we need consent from all the followers too? (It’ll be a logistical nightmare) Because if the activity is deemed illegal, the followers could come under scrutiny too in the future due the published findings of this research, including this artist’s details, leading the legal authorities to the followers in lieu of people with similar, illegal, tendencies.