Money talk with kids usually sounds like this: confusing, rushed, and ending with ‘just trust me.’ But what if the secret weapon was right in your hands (or to be more precise, was just your hands)? Imagine explaining inflation to an eight-year-old, you might say: “Prices keep rising, like a balloon getting bigger and bigger!” Chances are your hands stretch outward, tracing that invisible swelling sphere before you even realise it. Those airy moves aren’t just cute; research suggests they may literally be shaping young brains for savvier money choices down the road.

Psychologists have long shown that physical experiences and doing things such as stacking blocks and counting beads can help learning. But gestures that symbolise an action, without ever touching an object, can be just as powerful. Most evidence comes from maths lessons. My question: does the magic still work in another slippery, under-taught domain—money?

What We Did

• Participants 🧑‍🧒: 16 English-speaking child-caregiver pairs; children were 8–9 years old.
• Task 👾: A game-style lesson on 10 tricky financial words such as inflation, revenue and taxation. We let parents explain and gestures happen naturally (no scripts) to capture real-world learning dynamics. Parents explained the terms exactly as they would at the kitchen table and they got one minute for each concept; kids selected the best picture from an array of four and knew they’d have to teach the words back later.

• Gestures we tracked

Representational gestures: Hand movements that look likewhat they’re talking about (e.g., hands moving upwards for “prices going higher”) .  

Non-representational gestures: Generic gestures like rhythmic beats .

We also looked at the semantic affiliate, which are the exact words that the gesture connected to — to see whether speech and movement were marching in step.

After learning, the kids had two big tests:

1. Definition test: Could they explain the words in their own words right after learning?
2. Generalisation test: Could they apply their new knowledge to new situations, both right away and a week later?

What We Found

1. First, we found that adults were way more likely to act things out with their hands when a money idea was easier to visualise (like a balloon for inflation) than tricky, invisible ones.  
2. 🧒Kids were a bit more freestyle — more about what they could physically see from the screen than the big ideas they were talking about. This matches what we know: our brains love a good visual shortcut when we can get one.
3. But here’s the twist: more gestures didn’t automatically mean better learning. Sometimes, when both parent and child were waving 👋 around a lot (especially with different kinds of gestures), it actually made it harder for kids to remember the new words 🤨. Messy, mismatched hand traffic is not so helpful.
4. On the other hand, when kids used both types of gestures thoughtfully 🤔, especially for the more concrete money ideas, they showed stronger understanding. It wasn’t just flapping their arms around —  it was when gestures were meaningfully connected to what they were trying to explain that real learning happened 🙆‍♀️.

Why It Matters: Small Moves, Big Lessons

Gestures reflect how a person understands an idea. When kids (or adults) use the right kind of gestures at the right time, it can reveal, and maybe even support deeper learning. But just waving your hands while talking about “inflation rates” won’t automatically turn a child into the next Warren Buffett.

This has big implications beyond my experiment room. In classrooms, at home, even in cartoons – the way we use our bodies when teaching abstract ideas could make a real difference.

Especially for tricky subjects like financial literacy, which is famously under-taught in schools. These little extras could help bridge the gap between a confusing concept and a lightbulb moment 💡.

Imagine math class, but with more purposeful moving.

Or animated explainer videos where the characters don’t just talk — they gesture meaningfully.
Or parents being encouraged to act out “taxation” with Lego instead of just grumbling about their paycheck.

Limitations: No Magic Wands Here

Of course, gestures aren’t a silver bullet. Kids’ learning also depends on a ton of other things: their vocabulary, their experience, whether they had a snack recently (trust me on this one).

We asked kids to explain things from scratch. This is tougher than picking the right answer from a list which means we might have underestimated what they really understood ❓.

Another thing: while we tracked gestures and speech together, we didn’t fiddle with them. We didn’t tell parents or kids to use more gestures, or fewer, or a particular kind. We just let things happen naturally.
That’s great for keeping it real — but it leaves some mystery about cause and effect. Are gestures boosting learning? Or do confident explainers just happen to gesture more?

More research is needed to untangle exactly when and how gestures boost learning and when they just add noise.

In short: gestures are exciting, but we’re still learning how much they help, who they help most, and what kinds of gestures really move the needle.

Final Takeaway: Let Your Hands Do Some Talking

Next time you’re explaining something complicated: whether it’s how taxes work or why bedtime exists, watch your hands 👀.
Better yet, use your hands deliberately and smartly🧠. A simple gesture might make the invisible visible and turn a baffled shrug into an “Aha!” But bear in mind that gestures are like seasoning — the right pinch in a right dish, but dump too much in the wrong plate, and you just get a mess🤪.

Sometimes, understanding big ideas starts with small movements.

（Word Count: 925)